Review contextEvidence packageDistribution tools
Kharg Island Terminal after evidence
Visible change only
Reviewed visible-change imagery pair
Top hero intentionally stays on the later reviewed frame only. The reviewed imagery pair is still available below as broad visible-change context, without precise damage callouts or feature-level labels.
Iran incident

Kharg Island Terminal

Reviewed earlier-versus-later imagery shows visible disturbance around the eastern Kharg berth and adjacent water, without a clear facility-outcome readout.

Visible-change pairReviewed visible-change imagery pairMAP → incident page → imagery pairReviewed imagery pairGeolocatedPublished
Powered by WarDataLab AI
Incident date
11 Apr 2026
Location
Iran · Iran
Confidence
Location aligned to reviewed site coordinates.
Review path
MAP → incident page → imagery pair
Evidence package split
1 claims · 1 baselines
Public reference
Public reference media
Open supporting material →
Analyst framing

How this incident is bounded on the public evidence surface

Public review posture

WarDataLab AI reviewed earlier-versus-later imagery carries the current packet, with watch leads and support reporting kept secondary.

Primary lanes 1Support lanes 2Watch lanes 1
Public references stay abstracted while review posture remains explicit.
Reviewed imagery
Visible lane
Reviewed imagery is visible here, but another analyst-reviewed lane still sets the public posture.
Reviewed imagery pair
Primary packet
Reviewed earlier-versus-later imagery pair is the current public packet.
Watch leads
Watch lane
4 public lead lanes stay on watch for fresher exact-scene material.
Support reporting
Support lane
6 support-reporting lanes remain in scope for caption and chronology only, not as standalone proof.
Reviewed claims
  • Reviewed earlier-versus-later imagery shows visible change around the eastern Kharg berth and adjacent water only.
  • Evidence path: REVIEWED IMAGERY PAIR.
  • Public wording stays capped at visible change and disturbance. No specific facility outcome is being claimed from this pair.
Reference posture
imagery providerPublic reference mediaconfirmed
A public-facing media reference exists for the visible image carried on this page.
Open review context →
packaging publisherWarDataLab reviewed packagingconfirmed
WarDataLab packages this public incident page and keeps its reviewed visible-change imagery pair posture bounded to the reviewed surface.
Open review context →
relay channelPublic lead laneconfirmed
A public lead link remains attached for review context without expanding the page claim.
Open review context →
Compare / context framing

Lower visible-change context

Visible-change mode only
Earlier reviewed image
How the earlier image is being used
  • The earlier reviewed image is shown only as rough context for visible change, not as a precise baseline for outcome claims.
Later reviewed image
What the later image is allowed to show
  • The later reviewed image is presented only as visible change around the berth area, not as proof of a specific facility outcome.
Claim boundary
What the claim excludes
  • The reviewed pair supports a cautious visible-change read around the berth and adjacent water. It does not support a stronger claim about the condition of any specific terminal structure or facility component.
  • The lower pair is kept in visible-change mode only. It adds context around the berth area, not a precise outcome readout.
Earlier reviewed image
Planet before asset
Kharg Island Terminal baseline evidence
This lower frame keeps the earlier image as loose visual context only. It does not introduce feature-level labels or a precise baseline for outcome claims.
Visible change only
Planet after asset
Kharg Island Terminal after evidence
This lower frame keeps the later image at broad visible change only. It does not attach precise feature-level labels or a stronger facility-outcome claim.
Canonical posture
Reviewed visible-change imagery pair
MAP → incident page → imagery pair
Location posture
Geolocated
Location aligned to reviewed site coordinates.
Evidence package
4/5 surfaced attachments
1 claims · 1 baselines
Surface framing
The lower pair is surfaced only as broad visible-change context beneath the single-image hero. It should be read as reviewed earlier-versus-later imagery, not as a precise outcome readout.
Earlier image posture
Rough visual context only
No callout layer
This lower frame keeps the earlier image as loose visual context only. It does not introduce feature-level labels or a precise baseline for outcome claims.
Precise baseline callouts are intentionally withheld on this incident.
Later image posture
Broad visible change only
No callout layer
This lower frame keeps the later image at broad visible change only. It does not attach precise feature-level labels or a stronger facility-outcome claim.
Precise later-image callouts are intentionally withheld on this incident.
Evidence chain

Repo-backed reviewed imagery packet

MAP → incident page → imagery pair

This incident is carried by a reviewed imagery pair, not a hidden analyst note. The chain below shows the exact packet state, scene dates, and public assets currently backing the visible-change-only surface.

Packet exported
11 Apr 2026, 12:00 UTC
Reviewed visible-change imagery pair • kharg-planet-review-2026-04-11.json
Before scene
17 Mar 2026
kharg-before-2026-03-17-reviewed • 100% AOI coverage
After scene
06 Apr 2026
kharg-after-2026-04-06-reviewed • 100% AOI coverage
Public imagery pair
14 Apr 2026, 14:10 UTC
Public imagery pair enabled with wording capped at visible disturbance/change only.
Analyst packet note
Public wording is capped at visible disturbance/change around the eastern berth and adjacent water. No confirmed facility-outcome claim.
AOI bounding box
50.279, 29.202, 50.371, 29.282
Source summary
Reviewed repo-backed Kharg Island Terminal imagery pair used for cautious public visible-change packaging.
Evidence package
4/5 surfaced
Composition
1 claims · 1 baselines · 1 manifests
Public handoff assets
The surfaced pair is public-safe and intentionally capped at visible change around the berth and adjacent water. It is not presented as a confirmed facility outcome.
Evidence package

Surfaced attachments and distribution discipline

4/5 surfaced
primary claim
Planet after asset
Scene kharg-after-2026-04-06-reviewed, coverage 100.0%.
baseline reference
Planet before asset
Scene kharg-before-2026-03-17-reviewed, coverage 100.0%.
review manifest
Planet staged manifest
Manifest describes the staged packet and exported compare assets.
Carries the canonical visible-change pair posture only
Uses 4/5 surfaced attachments without upgrading the claim
Keeps distribution tied to the map → incident page → imagery pair handoff path
Canonical URL
https://wardatalab.ai/incidents/kharg
Evidence hierarchy

Earlier and later reviewed imagery

Strongest public-safe surface first

The reviewed pair supports a cautious visible-change read around the berth and adjacent water. It does not support a stronger claim about the condition of any specific terminal structure or facility component.

Level 1
Planet before asset
Earlier reviewed frame
Shown as rough visual context only, not as a precise damage baseline.
Level 2
Planet after asset
Later reviewed frame
Shown for broad visible change only, not as proof of a specific destroyed structure.
Reference lane
Public reference media
Packaging mode
Reviewed visible-change imagery pair
REVIEWED IMAGERY PAIRreviewed earlier/later satellite imageryGeolocatedReviewed imagery pair
Honesty note

Public wording stays downstream of the reviewed imagery pair and remains capped at visible change around the berth and adjacent water. No specific facility outcome is implied.

Public distribution

Canonical share package

Open canonical page →
Canonical share frame
Kharg Island Terminal visible-change review
Kharg Island Terminal: reviewed imagery shows visible change around the eastern berth and adjacent water, with no stronger facility-outcome claim.
Visible-change pairMAP → incident page → imagery pairReviewed visible-change imagery pair
Canonical page iframe snippet
<iframe src="https://wardatalab.ai/incidents/kharg" title="Kharg Island Terminal visible-change review" width="100%" height="540" style="border:0;overflow:hidden;background:#05070b" loading="lazy"></iframe>
Canonical page markdown snippet
> Kharg Island Terminal visible-change review
> Kharg Island Terminal: reviewed imagery shows visible change around the eastern berth and adjacent water, with no stronger facility-outcome claim.
> https://wardatalab.ai/incidents/kharg
Carries the canonical visible-change pair posture only
Uses 4/5 surfaced attachments without upgrading the claim
Keeps distribution tied to the map → incident page → imagery pair handoff path
Attachments · 4/5
Primary claims · 1
Baselines · 1
Pending review · 0
Share package
Canonical URL
https://wardatalab.ai/incidents/kharg
Iframe snippet
<iframe src="https://wardatalab.ai/incidents/kharg" title="Kharg Island Terminal visible-change review" width="100%" height="540" style="border:0;overflow:hidden;background:#05070b" loading="lazy"></iframe>
Markdown snippet
> Kharg Island Terminal visible-change review
> Kharg Island Terminal: reviewed imagery shows visible change around the eastern berth and adjacent water, with no stronger facility-outcome claim.
> https://wardatalab.ai/incidents/kharg
Analyst identity
WarDataLab AI analyst desk
Reviewed public evidence · Reviewed imagery posture
Reviewed 21 Apr 2026

Only the evidence surfaced on-page is being claimed. Packaging does not imply hidden corroboration or a stronger unseen record.

Incident page signed for reviewed imagery-pair public packaging with visible-change-only wording.
Method
  • Source posture is capped at reviewed imagery pair.
  • Location confidence is stated as geolocated and carried through the page without escalation.
  • Earlier and later reviewed imagery are shown only as broad context for visible change, without a stronger feature-level outcome claim.
Signature
WDL / reviewed public-safe surface
Selective contribution

Send a vetted lead, not an open upload

WarDataLab AI accepts narrow contribution handoffs only when they can materially improve an already reviewed public-safe incident or bundle.

Email lead
What qualifies
  • Exact-scene media, coordinates, or review notes that materially strengthen a reviewed incident already on WarDataLab AI.
  • Trusted public leads that help validate what is already public-safe, without inflating the claim beyond the visible evidence.
Lead packaging checklist
  • Link or attachment to the supporting material
  • Exact incident or bundle URL on WarDataLab AI
  • Capture date or date range
Current intake
Kharg Island Terminal
If the lead is strong enough, WarDataLab AI reviews it and updates the existing incident or bundle so the public surface stays authoritative.
contact@wardatalab.ai
What stays out
  • Open community uploads or anonymous rumor dumps.
  • Claims without a traceable reference, exact scene, or timing context.
Related incidents
Same-theater, same-country, or same-packaging surfaces that help the reader continue through reviewed incident coverage.
Ain Mreisseh Waterfront Block after evidence
Aftermath-only
Aftermath-only

Ain Mreisseh Waterfront Block

Reviewed visible aftermath packaged for public reading without implying a hidden baseline pair.

Lebanon08 Apr 2026
GeolocatedView incident
Qasmiyah Bridge after evidence
Aftermath-only
Aftermath-only

Qasmiyah Bridge

Reviewed visible aftermath packaged for public reading without implying a hidden baseline pair.

Lebanon23 Mar 2026
GeolocatedView incident